Science, having spent centuries doing its humble and arduous homework, has finally become competent to address itself to the most fundamental questions of all, the questions asked by children and philosophers: How did it all begin? What am I? Quo vadimus?
All stars are suns. Some are larger and some smaller than the star that warms this Earth; some are younger, but most are older. Stars are not distributed uniformly or randomly throughout space, but instead occur in huge aggregations called galaxies; some of which show a spiral form, others an ellipsoidal shape. Our Galaxy, the Milky Way, is a spiral galaxy containing several hundred billion stars. The universe contains over a billion galaxies, or, in all, more stars than there are grains of sand on all the beaches of Earth.
Out of the findings of the sciences that have converged to give us our present picture of cosmic evolution we draw certain conclusions that are the premises of a plausibility argument for the prevalence of technologically advanced extraterrestrial life.
In their totality these premises argue that the Galaxy contains a tremendous number of planets on which life could start, and evolve, and that there is nothing special about Earth to favor it over the others. Sagan refers to this as the "assumption of mediocrity". It is important to note that the assumption of mediocrity does not imply that living systems elsewhere will have compositions and forms identical to those of Earth. Indeed, such a coincidence would be too improbable to expect. Nor does it imply that life began on every suitable planet, or that it evolved inevitably to possess intelligence and technological prowess. It does imply that the basic processes of stellar, chemical, biological, and cultural evolution are universal and, when carried to fruition, lead to technologies that must have close similarities to ours today and in the future.
It is not important that the particular sequence of events leading to intelligent life on Earth be repeated elsewhere, but only that some sequence occur that leads to a similar end result. Thus, the key question is not whether the precise conditions causing a particular sequence are replicated elsewhere, but whether the forcing functions are present and whether enough alternate routes exist.
The origin and evolution of life would appear to be favored if a planet provides a wide variety of environments -- that is, a range of values for every important parameter. Since all planets will have a range of climate from poles to equator, most will have tilted axes and therefore seasons, and many will have both seas and land and therefore solar tides, we can expect the variety of environments found on Earth to be common. For all we know, life on Earth may have had serious setbacks and been forced to re-evolve. If this be true, the genesis time on many planets may have been much shorter than four billion years.
We can, of course, continue to probe the universe, the atom, and ourselves. But so long as our cosmology is limited to unraveling the evolution of the physical universe and our molecular biology to unraveling the complex chemistry of Earth-based life alone, so long as we are limited to physical cosmology and to geocentric biology, many enormously exciting and very fundamental questions will remain unanswered; these include:
These are only a few of the many questions that might be answered by, and perhaps only by, establishing contact with another race. The day this happens will be the birth date for us of a new science, which we might call biocosmology.