home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
- CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
-
-
-
- Reported by Peter Kirstein/UCL
-
- ODA Minutes
-
- Agenda
-
-
- o Introduction of Participants.
- o Discussion of Charter.
- o Review of Documentation available.
- o Consideration of current status of standardisation.
- o Review of facilities needed for IETF-ODA Pilots.
- o Review of possible products.
- o Discussion of interaction with message systems.
- o Discussion of interaction with other working groups.
- o Review of possible programme and timetable.
- o Proposed further actions.
- o Methods of Working.
- o Arrangements for future Meetings.
-
-
- The attendees outlined their interests in the Working Group. Most were
- interested to use facilities provided to them; few were interested in
- developing facilities themselves. There was interest in the
- functionality of ODA, therefore a tutorial by Frank Held was organised
- as an evening session; it was attended by about 25 people.
-
- The group agreed that they would like to use existing software - but
- needed to know what was available.
-
- The Chair outlined the capabilities of ODA; it would enable the
- interchange of documents with various text capabilities (including
- Fonts), geometric graphics and bit-map graphics. It would allow,
- therefore, interchange of processable documents between different word
- processors. The bit-map graphics supported both Group 3 and Group 4
- facsimile formats - potentially of interest to the NETFAX Group. The
- standard is very general. To ensure the capability of document
- interchange, it is essential to define also a Document Application
- Profile (DAP), to which any product must conform. A particular DAP has
- been developed in Europe under the PODA project, and a number of
- products exist to this DAP (Q112,[1]). The Chair stated that software
- will be available to allow documents preparation and storage, and also
- document interchange to the DAP. He had identified three products which
- would support ODA from the beginning at the 3rd quarter of 1991: the
- SLATE editor from BBN (with UCL additions), a product from Xerox, and
-
- 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
- various DEC products for CDA. A version of WORD from Honeywell-Bull, and
- of WordPerfect from ICL would probably exist, and other products could
- be available by the summer. It was proposed, and agreed, that the group
- will try to get started as soon as possible on a pilot activity. The
- members of the group would want to experiment with the facilities
- themselves; if they were satisfactory, they could try to get other user
- groups interested.
-
- For a User Pilot, it was necessary to have not only an editor which
- could produce an ODA stream (ODIF), but also combine it with a mail
- system. The ODIF stream contained arbitrary 8 bit binary; therefore it
- could not be sent by RFC 822 mail without modification. Luckily the
- SMTPEXT group were proposing both a short-term and longer term
- recommendation for the extension of that system to support binary data.
- Another mail system (X.400) was the brief of the OSIX.400 Working Group;
- that system also supported binary data. It was agreed that the present
- Working Group make known its needs to, and use the mail systems defined
- by, the other two Working Groups. We need not consider mail further
- inside the present Working Group - except to make recommendations based
- on the actions received from the other groups. Some of the products of
- interest with the ODA capability (WORD, WordPerfect) existed currently
- only for PCs. The WG participants felt that they were already making
- adequate ad-hoc arrangements to incorporate documents from PCs into mail
- systems, and did not need - or want - the Working Group to address the
- mechanisms needed.
-
- In accordance with the Charter, the Chair promised to provide further
- details of product availability before the end of April. By that time,
- the interim recommendation of the SMTPEXT Working Group should be
- available. The aim was still that sufficient information should be
- available by that time, that an initial set of trials by participants
- should be possible between the lst and 2nd quarters of 1991, and that a
- detailed plan for a PILOT should be ready for the next IETF meeting in
- Atlanta.
-
- It was not thought necessary to have a further meeting prior to the next
- IETF, but a meeting during that week was planned.
-
- A set of documents relating to ODA had been put in an archive - further
- documents will be added to this database as they become available.
-
- Reference
-
-
- 1. EWOS: ODA Document Application Profile Q112 - Processable and
- formatted documents - Extended mixed mode, PrENV 41 510, Paris,
- 1988.
-
-
-
- 2
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Attendees
-
- Richard Bowles bowles@stsci.edu
- Ross Callon callon@bigfut.enet.dec.com
- David Crocker david_crocker@palo-alto.pa.dec.com
- Shari Galitzer shari@gateway.mitre.org
- Russ Hobby rdhobby@ucdavis.edu
- Darren Kinley kinley@crim.ca
- Peter Kirstein kirstein@cs.ucl.ac.uk
- Jim Knowles jknowles@trident.arc.nasa.gov
- Vincent Lau vlau@sun.com
- David Miller dtm@ulana.mitre.org
- Robert Morgan morgan@jessica.stanford.edu
- Robert Reschly reschly@brl.mil
- George Sanderson sanderson@mdc.com
- Mark Sherman mss+@andrew.cmu.edu
- Gregory Vaudreuil gvaudre@nri.reston.va.us
- John Veizades veizades@apple.com
- Wengyik Yeong yeongw@psi.com
-
-
-
- 3
-