home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990s
/
Time_Almanac_1990s_SoftKey_1994.iso
/
time
/
021389
/
02138900.043
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
5KB
|
109 lines
<text id=89TT0446>
<title>
Feb. 13, 1989: Towering Troubles
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
Feb. 13, 1989 James Baker:The Velvet Hammer
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
NATION, Page 36
Towering Troubles
</hdr><body>
<p>Bush's pick for the Pentagon faces questions about his conduct
</p>
<p> John Tower, Secretary of Defense-designate, is a
full-fledged member of the Capitol Hill old boys' network.
Before retiring from Congress after the 1986 election, he put in
four terms as a Republican Senator from Texas. For six years he
served as chairman of the Armed Services Committee, the panel
now judging his fitness to run the Pentagon. His old friends in
the upper chamber are eager to confirm his appointment, either
because of personal regard or because it would further a kind of
quasi alliance between Congress and the Bush Administration that
both need for their own purposes. But . . .
</p>
<p> But no one dares ram through a confirmation unless Tower,
63, can decisively dispel rumors of drinking and womanizing
that have dogged him for years. Last week those charges arose
at the next-to-last moment to haunt him yet again. The Armed
Services Committee had scheduled a vote for Thursday that looked
certain to be affirmative and to pave the way for confirmation
by the full Senate. That morning, however, Committee Chairman
Sam Nunn of Georgia and ranking Republican John Warner of
Virginia agreed to put off the vote indefinitely. Their
explanation: new allegations serious enough to demand a check
by the FBI.
</p>
<p> Nunn and Warner would not disclose the charges. But after
Paul Weyrich, a former Senate staffer, became the first
committee witness to talk publicly about Tower's alleged
drinking and sexual escapades, the committee was inundated with
calls reporting "sightings" of Tower either in a less than
sober state or with women, both before and after the FBI
conducted a supposedly thorough background check in January. (It
was learned last week that the FBI actually completed only the
first part of a three-part investigation before Bush sent
Tower's name to the Senate.) Committee insiders say many callers
were pranksters, but several gave names and addresses and agreed
to talk to investigators. At week's end the White House
authorized a renewed FBI background investigation of Tower.
</p>
<p> It seems unlikely that anyone could come up with evidence of
misconduct strong enough to swing a majority of the Senate
against Tower. But at minimum, the momentum has leaked out of
his confirmation drive. Tower already has the unenviable
distinction of being the first Cabinet hopeful in memory to be
asked point-blank if he is a drunk.
</p>
<p> That happened after Weyrich, who heads the archconservative
Free Congress Research and Education Foundation, charged in an
open hearing that Tower could become a "national embarrassment"
as Secretary of Defense. "Over the course of many years," he
explained, "I have encountered the nominee in a condition, a
lack of sobriety, as well as with women to whom he was not
married." Nunn would hear no more right then, though he
promised Weyrich a chance to elaborate in closed session. In a
later open hearing, Nunn asked Tower "whether you yourself have
any alcohol problem." Tower's answer: "I have none, Senator. I
am a man of some discipline."
</p>
<p> Another line of questioning, however, may eventually damage
Tower even more. Between 1986 and late 1988, he was paid
$750,000 in consulting fees by several major defense
contractors. He had earlier served as chief American negotiator
in START talks aimed at limiting strategic nuclear missiles. He
told the committee that his firm provided both Martin Marietta
and LTV with information on the impact a separate INF treaty
banning medium-range missiles might have on their businesses.
Michigan Democrat Carl Levin suggested those contacts might
create the appearance that Tower had leaked to the contractors
secret information about the U.S. arms negotiating position.
No, said Tower, he provided only "a sort of academic speculation
on what was likely to happen." But why would the contractors
pay so much for mere "speculation"? The words "influence
peddling," while not pronounced, hung heavy in the air.
</p>
<p> None of this is likely to erode the White House's strong
support for Tower. The diminutive Texan's 1962 success in
becoming the first Republican Senator from the Lone Star State
since Reconstruction helped inspire oilman George Bush to enter
Texas G.O.P. politics. Last year Tower was one of the first
prominent Republicans to endorse Bush, and he stumped hard for
Bush throughout the campaign. Tower has coveted the post of
Secretary of Defense for at least eight years; he asked Ronald
Reagan for it in early 1981 and renewed his request immediately
after Bush won last year. By then it had become a job of
squeezing down a bloated military establishment. Even if Tower
survives the confirmation process and takes over the No. 2 post
in the Cabinet, it could be as a drastically weakened Pentagon
boss, beset by continuing suspicions that have been neither
proved nor disproved.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>