home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1990s
/
Time_Almanac_1990s_SoftKey_1994.iso
/
time
/
031191
/
0311201.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-04-15
|
4KB
|
94 lines
<text id=91TT0505>
<link 89TT2889>
<title>
Mar. 11, 1991: Then There Was One
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
Mar. 11, 1991 Kuwait City:Feb. 27, 1991
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
BUSINESS, Page 69
Then There Was One
</hdr><body>
<p>The Senate ethics panel spears Cranston but spares the rest
</p>
<p> The timing almost seemed designed for minimum exposure, like
putting a rerun of Nova up against Cheers. The day the whole
world was watching the gulf war end was the moment the Senate
Select Committee on Ethics chose to issue its long-delayed
report on the Keating Five. The committee found that only the
aged, ailing California Senator Alan Cranston, 76, had engaged
in "impermissible conduct" in which "fund raising and official
activities were substantially linked." The case of the Keating
One will be referred to the whole Senate for possible action.
The other four are officially off the hook.
</p>
<p> The findings came after a 14-month investigation detailing
how more than $1 million in contributions, four trips to the
Bahamas and all-expense-paid stays at resort hotels found their
way from indicted savings and loan executive Charles Keating,
who needed protection from federal regulators trying to shut
him down, to five U.S. Senators and their staffs. The committee
found Senators John Glenn of Ohio ($234,000 in Keating
contributions) and John McCain of Arizona ($112,000) the least
culpable, engaging only in "poor judgment" because they gave
Keating less help than did the others. Senators Donald Riegle
of Michigan ($76,000) and Dennis DeConcini of Arizona ($55,000
along with more than $50 million in real estate loans from
Lincoln Savings to top campaign aides) gave the "appearance of
being improper" because their intervention for Keating was more
extensive.
</p>
<p> Fred Wertheimer, president of the citizens' lobby Common
Cause, which initially demanded the investigation, was outraged
at the lenient treatment, and angrily commented: "The U.S.
Senate remains on the auction block to the Charles Keatings of
the world." Joan Claybrook, president of Public Citizen, called
the report a "whitewash."
</p>
<p> The committee's ruling offered no guidance as to what is
legal and illegal. All five helped Keating and all five
accepted money during the same period of time. But only
Cranston, who received $982,000 from the S&L kingpin, failed
to observe a respectful amount of time between service rendered
and money collected. DeConcini hosted a high-level meeting at
which he outlined Keating's demands, which gave an "appearance
of being improper" in the eyes of the ethics panel. Glenn, who
arranged a luncheon for Keating with then Speaker Jim Wright,
was deemed merely to have "exercised poor judgment."
</p>
<p> The committee recommended that the Senate draw up new
guidelines governing constituent service and campaign finances.
For now, there are no written rules distinguishing between the
sort of constituent service that helps a citizen collect
Medicare benefits and service that consists of organizing
secret meetings and high-level luncheons or making threatening
calls to federal regulators. While large sums changed hands,
the report pointed out, no one was personally enriched by
Keating's largesse. Nonetheless the committee seemed to overlook
the fact that, among those who lust for power, money in the
campaign treasury is a much bigger carrot than money in the
pocket.
</p>
<p> It may be left to the voters to decide the ultimate fate of
the Keating Five. Citing health reasons, Cranston decided last
November not to seek re-election in 1992; but his support has
fallen so precipitously that half of California voters polled
believe he should resign now. Bolstered by their national-hero
status, former astronaut Glenn and former POW McCain, the
group's lone Republican, have recovered from the beating they
took in the polls right after the Keating affair became public.
DeConcini and Riegle have not been so lucky. Polls show that
if they were up for re-election today, any challenger with a
pulse could beat them.
</p>
<p>By Margaret Carlson.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>