home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
-
-
-
-
- fmagine the computers used at Moscow
- University. Can any system of locks, passwords and
- audit trails really stop a student underground from
- using the computer as a bulletin board? Of course
- not' The computer is always at the beck and call of
- every user. It will follow a program to unlock a lock
- as surely as it will follow a program to re-lock an
- unlocked lock.
-
- These problems for ehe State will persist and grow
- exponentially as the size and cost of computers
- decrease It is with good reason that the USSR only
- builds copies of the computers which we used 10
- years ago. The IBM 370, the DEC VAX, the other
- physically large, costly machines are the only
- defense against tota} dissolution of the Soviet State.
- Can you imagine what would happen if, as in
- America, students could checkout a desktop
- computer? "Please, comrade librarian, I need to
- work some differential equations and distribute 100
- copies of Orwell's 1984."
-
- When the USSR acqu~res an American
- computer, they try to get the powerful, "small"
- systems, especially the DEC VAX, which can be
- used to guide, control and coordinate military
- equipment. lIowever, the Soviet military is merely
- the highest priority; it is not the only priority.
- A wide-open trade in computers would be disaster
- for the Soviet system. They cannot afford to let
- every Ivan have a home computer.
-
- The Soviet leadership is between a rock and a
- hard place. They must have computers to remain
- competitive with the West. Yet, the spread of
- computers will make it harder for them to control
- their own populace.
-
- Dictatorships fear the spread of ideas and
- doctrines which do not originate with the State.
- Alexander Solzhenitsynwas hounded, not because
- he is a capitalist, but because he is an Orthodox
-
- Christian. A student of Objectivism might point out
- that both Communism and Christianity are
- altru~stic and collectivistic. That is immaterial to the
- Kremlin. They demand obedience, not discussion.
-
- The Soviet Union, like any other dictatorship,
- cannot tolerate the spread of ideas. Personal
- computers are a powerful tool for exchanging
- information. The United States could weaken the
- Soviet ruling class by aggressively exporting
- computers to the USSR.
-
- True, the Kremlin would resist. On the other
- hand, they also import wheat and sell platinum to
- the USA. Personal computers could become a
- bargaining chip in East-West trade agreements.
-
- Currently, the American government (imitating
- its friends in the Kremlin) is attempting to prevent
- the export of computers to the USSR. The most
- highly pnzed machine is the VAX made by Digital
- Equipment Corporation. The DEC VAX is a true
- general purpose machine which can be used in
- finance, industry and military applications. The
-
- ^- `.
- 1 66 ~
- r~\
-
- . _.
-
- American rulers argue that letting the USSR have
- these computers would make our enemy stronger.
-
- It is true that tbere would be an apparent short-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- term gain for the Russians in getting enough DEC
- VAXs to run their anti-aircraft missiles, establish
- viable battlef~eld tactics and make and break codes
- and ciphers. On the other hand, remember that the
- military is not the only lobbyist group in the
- Politburo. A Marxist state is centralized
- democracy, not a mil~tary junta.
-
- Even if it were trne that the first 50 VAXs would
- go to the military, the next 50 would go to Gosbank,
- the Soviet Federal Reserve. Once installed in
- Gosbank (or Uralmetal or wherever), these
- machines could be properly abused by more or less
- pnvate c~t~zens. Bank managers and industrial
- supervisors could deal more effectively in the black
- market. Editors and typesetters who now produce
- propaganda could produce satires on the side.
- Urban planners could play video games. People in
- all walks of life could write essays or manage their
- meager budgets.
-
- While the Kremlin may desire VAXs today, it will
- be only a matter of time before the computers they
- import will get ~ smaller and cheaper. A strong
- negotiator could force them to accept 5,000 IBM-
- PCs for every 50 mainframes. (Actually, the best
- thing would be to let our capitalists deal with the
- Kremlin l~ke any other customer.)
-
- Now the mass import of computers itself wil] not
- end Communism. The Soviets succeed over the
- West because they live by a wel!-defined philosphy.
- America has been losing the Cold War because we
- have no idea who we are or what we are. Reagan
- never uses the word "capitalism" in public. Any
- reference to "free enterprise" is usually followed
- with a reference to the need for`'some" goverument
- regulation. In point of fact, the differences between
- the people in the Capitol and the people in the
- Kremlin are differences in degree, not kind. The
- trade embargo against the export of computers is an
- example of this.
-
- Like all such measures, this regulation not ouly
- faiis to solve the perceived problem, it actually
- makes matters worse.
-
- The American computer industry has been
- plagued by imports of '&pirate clones" from Hong
- Kong. (The Apple computer company has cried the
- loudest.) Given that the USSR wants computers
- and given that they cannot buy them from American
- companies, they will 1ust buy them from someone
- else.
-
- Reagan saw the error in the Carter Wheat
- Embargo Perhaps he w~ll see the error in the
- computer embargo.
-
- Computers, CB radios and video tape players are
- exactly what the Soviet ruling class fears. They can
- match the USA missile for missile. They have no
- defense against ideas in the minds of their own
- people. The greatest weakness that the Kremlin has
- is that given the importation of items like these, they
- will not be bought first by Siberian farmers, but by
- aMuent Party members.
-
- In our own country, the Statists are likewise
- dismayed at the Frankenstein's monster which they
- must face. Without computers, there~is no way the
- bureaucracy can function in modern terms. At the
- same time, they cannot be more effective than the
-
-