Day 022 - 12 Sep 94 - Page 03

     
     1
     2   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I have a letter signed by Ms. Steel here to
     3        Barlows 12th September.
     4
     5   MR. MORRIS:  Yes.  That is about the ones we have just served.
     6
     7   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes, is that to go in a bundle?
     8
     9   MR. MORRIS:  Correspondence, that is correspondence.  The
    10        plaintiffs have reorganised their nutritional bundle or
    11        the nutritional bundle, I think it was originally 6, it is
    12        now two volumes, 6 and 6A.
    13
    14   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.
    15
    16   MR. MORRIS:  It may be our error, I am not sure, but just three
    17        of the documents are different from the original.  For a
    18        start there are a whole lot of new, most of the ones
    19        served are new documents in those bundles.  In fact, some
    20        have not yet, I do not think, arrived.  We have not had
         time to look at all those documents yet; they were only
    22        served last week.  I do not know if you have seen those?
    23
    24   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I received a letter saying that there were
    25        certain new documents in there, but I did not make a point
    26        of reading them.
    27
    28   MR. MORRIS:  For the record, in bundle number volume VI, No. 6,
    29        it has a different date from the original one.  So far as
    30        I can see, it says July 1989, the old one said October
    31        1991.  I am not making an issue of this.  If I could put
    32        it on the record it can be checked at lunch time or
    33        something?  New No. 10 which was old number -----
    34
    35   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What do you say the date of the previous one
    36        was in tab 6?
    37
    38   MR. MORRIS:  I have the previous one here; it is October 1991.
    39        The new one is July 1989; the old one was No. 2 in the old
    40        bundle.  I might be wrong.  Then new number 10 which was
         old No. 3 is also different; new 10 is 1986.  I am not
    42        sure if I have the date for the old one.  I will just
    43        throw that into the pot anyway.  New No. 5 (which was old
    44        No. 4) is October 1985 and the previous one was March
    45        1985, October 1984.  If the plaintiffs can check I might
    46        have got that wrong?
    47
    48   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I am sure they hear what you are saying.
    49        I can be told whether you are right or not in due course.
    50 
    51   MR. MORRIS:  I think we are ready to call the witness. 
    52 
    53                          DR. ARNOTT, recalled.
    54
    55   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Were there any further matters in-chief you
    56        wanted to ask?
    57
    58   MR. RAMPTON:  No, my Lord, not just now.
    59
    60