Day 177 - 26 Oct 95 - Page 07


     
     1        If you cannot, call Mr. Gibney on Monday, ask him about
     2        Colchester and Milton Keynes, ask him about the additional
     3        matters 2 to 11 in so far as they apply to Colchester or
     4        Milton Keynes; Mr. Rampton cross-examines on the basis
     5        which I said.
     6
     7        I am not looking at it as a trade.  The trade for you being
     8        able to lead him perhaps blind, as it were, on Monday, is
     9        that Mr. Rampton may be allowed to call witnesses in
    10        rebuttal after Mr. Gibney rather than before.  There is no
    11        advantage or disadvantage in that one way or the other.
    12
    13        What worries me is -- I do not want to put Mr. Gibney off;
    14        while my mind is on Colchester, I would like to get on with
    15        it -- if I ask you to give written particulars of what
    16        Mr. Gibney is going to say before you call him, my guess is
    17        that when you call him he will say something additional
    18        anyway, so we will be back in a rebuttal situation.
    19
    20   MR. MORRIS:  Can I just say, very briefly, the additional points
    21        are not exactly new points; they are all really touched on
    22        by fundamental things that are raised in his statement or
    23        in the statements of the other Colchester witnesses which
    24        the Plaintiffs have had served on them two years ago, so
    25        they know those kind of issues are being raised.  I will
    26        not go into detail, because I think we have gone past that
    27        stage.  That is all I have to say on that.
    28
    29   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Right.  What about -----
    30
    31   MR. MORRIS:  He is quite difficult to get hold of.
    32
    33   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  What about Mr. Pearson and performance
    34        related pay?  Do you know what that relates to, or has he
    35        just delivered the words "performance related pay" to you?
    36
    37   MR. MORRIS:  Well, as far as I understand it, obviously, he has
    38        talked about low pay, which is not surprising, and the
    39        Plaintiffs have tried to justify what I would call their
    40        low pay by saying that there is performance related pay.
    41        As an expert, he is entitled to comment upon previous
    42        evidence.  I just thought it was courtesy, really, to give
    43        the Plaintiffs an opportunity to know that he would make
    44        that particular comment.  As far as overtime is concerned,
    45        that was something which you -----
    46
    47   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Do not worry about overtime.  I could
    48        probably give the evidence myself.
    49
    50   MR. MORRIS:  So there is not anything else to say.  He will give 
    51        his view, which is what I have said there.  I have not 
    52        expressed it very well. 
    53
    54   MR. JUSTICE BELL: You do not find it difficult to get hold of
    55        him, do you?
    56
    57   MR. MORRIS:  No.  I can get hold of him; it is just getting him
    58        to write something down that is the problem.  That is all
    59        he told me.  He just said, if it helps the court -- he does
    60        not have to talk about any detail about performance related

Prev Next Index