Day 251 - 17 May 96 - Page 16
1 Q. I said to you the Morganti lists, did you send that list to
2 the Pastoral Land Commission?
3 A. Yes.
4
5 Q. Is this their response?
6 A. This is their response.
7
8 Q. Are the municipalities mentioned on their list in
9 Portuguese with the list of ranches that they know of where
10 there have been conflicts, are they -- well, you can
11 translate the introduction, but is my understanding right
12 that they are the specific areas which McDonald's had
13 identified through the Morganti list?
14 A. Yes, they took this list of, I think it is, 97, about
15 97, municipios, which are the municipal, the local
16 districts, in Goias where they were buying beef, buying
17 cattle, and out of this list roughly a third, according to
18 the Pastoral Land Commission, they figure in their list of
19 municipios, of local districts, where there are ranches
20 which have had either land conflicts or have had serious
21 problems with the treatment of the labour force on these
22 ranches. They specify in their ----
23
24 Q. May be if you could translate that?
25 A. What I have got is a very poor photocopy, but I think I
26 can read it. Here is the listing of areas with conflicts
27 in the municipios, the local districts, that supply meat to
28 McDonald's but Braslo it should be, should it not? The
29 list was made taking all the areas in these locations
30 independently of the fact whether there is or not
31 continuity in the conflict due to the lack of time, because
32 I only faxed them... They have not had very much time to
33 actually investigate. What they are actually saying in
34 this paragraph is, these are the ranches where there have
35 been land conflicts or reported abuses of the labour force,
36 some of them may be overlayed, a settlement may have been
37 reached, they may not all be land conflicts which are still
38 continuing. They say "we include both land conflicts..."
39
40 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What I suggest you do, if you are going to
41 pursue this, as you obviously are, you should get a written
42 translation of it and then put your Civil Evidence Act
43 notice on this statement of the -- it is a woman who has
44 signed it?
45 A. Yes.
46
47 Q. Inez?
48 A. Yes.
49
50 Q. So that, subject to any argument from Mr. Rampton, becomes
51 her Civil Evidence Act statement, you understand? What I
52 suggest you do, just so I can appreciate what it will be
53 said that this says in due course, it would be convenient
54 to me if Miss Branford gives her translation. Now, we will
55 not necessarily treat that as part of her evidence, but so
56 we can all see where we may be going at some stage in the
57 future. So would you like to start, 'to Sue Branford, BBC
58 Americas' and then?
59 A. 'Here is the survey of the areas in'.
60