Day 301 - 15 Nov 96 - Page 23
1 better word. Obviously, inevitably that is going to
2 include any disadvantaged groups in society who have less
3 choice even than other people.
4
5 McDonald's obviously try to claim this as some kind of
6 moral high ground in terms of they seem to have this equal
7 opportunity policy and, as we have heard in any event, the
8 hierarchy of McDonald's does not represent the make-up of
9 their staff percentages in terms of women and ethnic
10 minorities employed on the shop floor. It does not get
11 transferred, those same percentages into the higher
12 positions.
13
14 Is there anything that you would like me to help you with
15 as regards fact and comment? That was a kind of natural
16 run through on my feet.
17
18 MR. JUSTICE BELL: No, I think I have taken down a note of the
19 meaning which you would suggest it bears and which you
20 would say is defamatory, and at the moment I understand you
21 to say that, certainly the part which relates to bad pay
22 and conditions, that is a general charge which you can
23 justify by reference to all the evidence about levels of
24 pay and conditions, including for instance, health and
25 safety matters which are referred to. Or, alternatively,
26 you can defend by saying it is comment and it is fair,
27 looking at the matters which you have established which are
28 related in the leaflet or sufficiently referred to,
29 although that would not in fact include health and safety,
30 subject to anything that you wish to say to me on that
31 point of law in due course. Do you remember the one
32 I talked about the other day?
33
34 MR. MORRIS: Yes. I cannot understand the Plaintiffs' meaning,
35 pay bad wages and provide bad working conditions. I mean,
36 what it says is they do badly obviously, in comparison in
37 terms of pay and conditions. So it is very much a
38 comparative point which is only sensible, otherwise it
39 would be like what a Martian thinks about pay and
40 conditions, it has to be compared to something else. This
41 is where the-----
42
43 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What I suggest you do is, unless there is
44 something particular you want to say now, or Ms. Steel does
45 about that, you go on with what you want to say to me about
46 the actual facts of the matter, and if you want to come
47 back to re-visit this, if it is your plan at the end, as
48 you have indicated, that you hope to discuss the matter
49 with Ms. Steel and then have a canter through the whole
50 leaflet saying what you think is comment at the end of your
51 joint submissions, then you can do that. But what
52 I suggest you do now, if it is convenient to you, is go on
53 with telling me what you suggest the relevant facts are and
54 point me in the direction of the evidence to support them.
55
56 MR. MORRIS: Right. OK. Again, just to refer to Mr. Rampton's
57 opening speech on how he put over the issue of health and
58 safety, he says, "Are the Plaintiffs' policies and
59 practices in relation to the health and safety of their
60 employees open to serious criticism?" And again, we would