Day 301 - 15 Nov 96 - Page 24


     
     1        say, you know, do people have a right to criticise, it is
     2        not a question of whether you have a right to seriously
     3        criticise.
     4
     5        And he then says, for example, "Do McDonald's cynically
     6        exploit the weak position of women and ethnic minorities in
     7        the labour market?"   Actually, that is a bit of admission
     8        that that is the issue, because he sums it up very well,
     9        actually, apart from the 'cynically'.  "Do McDonald's
    10        exploit the weak position of women and ethnic minorities in
    11        the labour market for McDonald's to supply themselves with
    12        cheap labour?"  Well, as the leaflet says, it is not that
    13        they go out to get as many women and black people as
    14        possible, it is just a result of the weak position of those
    15        people in the labour market that they inevitably go for the
    16        lower paid jobs.  Of course, McDonald's is one of the lower
    17        paid jobs.  So that is all I have to say about that.
    18
    19        Going through our what we might call 'core evidence' on
    20        this subject, let us see what order we can do this in.
    21        (Pause) I think we have heard that they employ about 40,000
    22        employees now in the UK -- about 30,000, five or six years
    23        ago.  Over one and a half million worldwide.
    24
    25   MR. JUSTICE BELL:   Does the one and a half million include all
    26        franchisees, subsidiaries, and everything else?
    27
    28   MR. MORRIS:   Yes.
    29
    30   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  The 40,000 in the UK and 30,000 were just the
    31        second Plaintiffs' own stores were they not?
    32
    33   MR. MORRIS:   I don't think so, because certainly at the
    34        beginning of the case, when McDonald's was discussed, it
    35        was always as, if you like, the whole system.  It only
    36        became an issue to start separating out franchisees after a
    37        certain part in the case.  So, I think, unless I am wrong,
    38        and I have not got the figures in front of me and
    39        I probably will not have them in the submission, that I got
    40        the impression we are were talking about all the workers at
    41        any McDonald's store.  But Mr. Rampton no doubt will have
    42        -----
    43
    44   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  I had a recollection of a figure of 31,000,
    45        whenever that was, in 1990, and that was the second
    46        Plaintiffs' own stores, because at that time there were not
    47        a great number of franchisee anyway.
    48
    49   MR. MORRIS:   Only a handful.
    50
    51   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  As you say, you have not got the answer now,
    52        so do not go on.  Mr. Rampton may give you the figures
    53        anyway.  The reason I ask is this: I have got the figures
    54        of numbers of restaurants in this country and worldwide, it
    55        may be important to have figures for employees to see
    56        whether incidents which have been proved are a guide to
    57        what is going on generally, because that may be a matter
    58        which I have got to...  Well, it will be a matter I have
    59        got to give some thought to.
    60

Prev Next Index